cum mouth

Thereīs such an enormous amount of literature written by and about Freud-and it is so easy to fall prey to certain platitudes-that Iīve been careful here. Freud obviously spent a great deal of energy describing our oral, anal and genital stages, but it would be a gross simplification to say that people who smoke a lot or are heavily into oral sex are stuck in the oral stage. Freud doesnīt speak directly much about it. He evokes it, but he passes quickly over the subject. Of course he heard about fellatio in the course of treating patients, but he cum mouth never drew a specific theory as it relates to the oral stage in our development. Itīs somewhat of a paradox. Iīm not a psychoanalyst, so I donīt want to make any sweeping commentary here.

There has been some talk about teens in America having oral sex at increasingly younger ages and with increasing casualness. This seems very much the opposite of how itīs perceived in France, where fellatio is considered more intimate than lovemaking. To what do you attribute these particular cultural differences?

We have to be careful not to generalize and stereotype here. But on some level cum mouth Monica Lewinsky has become a symbol for us. She performed fellatio, talked about it, made money off of it. In her milieu, people engage in superficial sex; they donīt commit or engage themselves. Itīs not about lovemaking. In France weīre more Mediterranean; we donīt take these things lightly. Youīll never find a French Monica Lewinsky. She performed the most lucrative blow job in the history of humanity.

To male boomers, the practice of oral sex involves the reduction of a woman into a desiring body (or, more accurately, a body part) available for servicing them. The word “score,” of cum mouth course, speaks volumes.